Click the button to find out more about this year’s AAIC (Airship Association International Conference):
Airship Types
Non-rigid Airships
The non-rigid airship in its simplest form is a streamlined envelope, containing the lifting gas, with a gondola suspended below it containing the crew accommodation, propulsion and fuel. Most gas airships today are non-rigids because of their comparative simplicity and sturdiness. The modern non-rigid or pressure airship maintains its shape solely by the pressure of the helium in the envelope, supplemented by an adjustable volume of air within internal ballonets. A non-rigid airship, sometimes called a blimp, consists of:
​
-
the envelope - the primary structure containing the helium gas and the ballonets.
-
the ballonets - air bags inside the envelope which regulate the internal pressure, shape and trim. Air is squeezed out of the ballonets as the gas expands with increasing altitude and forced back in again as the helium contracts when the airship descends.
-
the gondola is the airship's cabin containing the cockpit, engine compartment and facilities for crew, passengers and cargo. It is suspended from cables attached either to an internal load curtain or externally to the envelope sides.
-
propulsion is provided by airscrew engines and may include vectored thrust to assist take-off, landing and holding stationary flight.
-
the empennage - fins, rudders and elevators provide dynamic stability and steerage.
Semi-rigid Airship
The semi-rigid airship differs from the non-rigid in having a load-bearing keel (sometimes running the whole length of the ship) below the envelope, or a frame within the envelope. The keel or frame provides the primary attachment for the gondola(s), engines etc. The semi-rigid airship maintains its shape mainly by the pressure of the lifting gas in the envelope. In the 1920s an Italian semi-rigid airship flew from Norway to Alaska and is now recognised as the first aircraft to fly over the North Pole. The Zeppelin NT airship, designed and constructed in the late 1990s but still in active service today, incorporates an internal load-carrying frame constructed of carbon fibre. This frame is used to carry the engines and gondola, but it does not give the shape of the envelope. This construction, while it has been successful, was chosen to fulfill very specific criteria, and may not have been selected without those customer requirements. The CargoLifter design from the turn of the new century also contained a rigid keel, and while this was never completed it would have been the largest semi-rigid constructed.
Rigid Airships
The rigid airship contained an internal framework constructed of a lightweight but strong material providing a rigid structure within which were the lifting gas cells; machinery; fuel and living/working space. A separate cover went over the outside of the framework to provide streamlining and weatherproofing. On a typical rigid airship, the hull structure was built upon a row of coaxial circular transverse frames, each kept in shape by a diaphragm of wire bracing which also served to divide the hull internally into compartments, each housing a gasbag. Longitudinal girders connected the peripheries of these frames and were in turn stabilised against axial buckling by further light intermediate transverse frames, which had open centres to clear the gasbags. The intersecting girders and frames divided the outer shell into rectangular panels, each of which was then wire braced to confer adequate rigidity upon the whole assembly.
Despite its essential simplicity, this structure presented unprecedented problems in stress analysis at the design stage. Never before had such large space structures been contemplated within the context of a rigorous weight limitation allied to highly speculative loading requirements. New techniques for load analysis were developed, based upon iterative procedures that still form the basis of much computer methodology; in the absence of such devices at the time, however, teams of analysts had to toil with slide rules and drawing boards for weeks on end, like the hypothetical host of monkeys typing Shakespeare, to unravel the load distributions and wire tensions for the assumed flight cases. As the wire bracing threw virtually all the structural members into compression, important advances were also initiated in the design of light-weight compression girders.
​
In construction, as well as in analysis and design, the rigid airship framework was labour-intensive to a degree that might now be dismissed as economically prohibitive; welding techniques for light alloys were still not commercially applicable, so the complex and fragile girders had to be riveted at thousands of small joints, while the whole grid of wire-braced panels had finally to be tuned like some vast piano in pursuit of an optimum load distribution.
​
The first rigid airships were built in the early 1900s, most famously by Ferdinand Count von Zeppelin, whose success with the type led to the name Zeppelin becoming synonymous with the concept of large airships built around an internal skeleton. Rigid airships were used to create the first scheduled passenger air-routes before the First World War, but were then expropriated for military purposes to become the first bombers. Due to the use of hydrogen as a lifting gas, the rigid airships were relatively easy to destroy with aeroplanes and made spectacular victories. After 1918, rigid airships were used both for military purposes by the Americans, and for civilian passenger transport by the Zeppelin Company.
​
Rigid Airships made the first east-west crossing of the Atlantic Ocean, the first aerial circumnavigation of the globe and were planned by the British government to open air-routes to India, Canada and South America. The British experiment with rigid airships, as a means of connecting the empire, took the form of a public/private competition. The competition was held to see who could build a more suitable vehicle for trans-imperial routes private industry of government departments. Tragically, this competition came to an inglorious conclusion after the loss of the government built R 101.Despite the successful flights of the privately built R-100, the government terminated the Imperial Airship programme, and forced the scrapping of R-100 .
​
The Germans continued to build Zeppelins up until 1939, with the very successful Graf Zeppelin LZ-127, the Hindenburg LZ-129 and the later Graf Zeppelin II LZ-130, operating a scheduled transatlantic service up to 1938. The use of Rigid Airships for passenger transport came to an end with the Hindenburg disaster of 1937. The last designs of the pre-war Zeppelin company were intended to use helium as a lifting gas, but America (at the time the only supplier of helium) declined to sell supplies to Nazi Germany. Subsequent development of the aeroplane during the Second World War meant that further construction of rigid airships became uneconomical.
The U.S. Navy experimented with Rigid Airships throughout the 1920s and 1930s, culminating in the construction of two airship aircraft carriers USS Akron and USS Macon, each carrying five scout planes. These were used as airborne scouts for the American Fleet, but the conventional Navy never accepted the concept, and the destruction of both airships in accidents terminated any further official interest in the programme.
​
Pathfinder-1, being developed by LTA Research in the U.S.A., is a great example of a modern rigid airship but with carbon fibre struts and modern hull fabrics replacing the aluminium girders and doped canvas of the classic rigid airships from the 1920s and 30s.
Hybrid Airships
Hybrid Airships attempt to combine aerostatic lift, from the conventional Lighter Than Air (LTA) concept, with various aerodynamic lift capabilities derived from the heavier-than-air industry. Hybrid airships have been proposed for many years, and there are a variety of projects that have attempted to marry the technologies together.
​
-
Piasecki Helistat (USA) - Rotary lift
-
Aeron Lifting body (USA)
-
Skycat/Hybrid Air Vehicles (UK) - Lifting body
-
Lockheed Martin (USA) - Lifting body
-
Boeing Skyhook (USA) - Rotary Lift
-
RosAeros (Russia) - Variable buoyancy by gas compression
-
Varialift (UK) - Variable buoyancy by gas compression
-
Aeroscraft (USA) - Variable buoyancy by gas compression
-
The Soviet Thermoplane - a helium/hot air cargo transport
Lockheed Martin were the first organisation to fly a manned proof of concept vehicle with their P791, which first flew in January 2006. Although video of the first flight shows, what appears to be, alarming instability, Lockheed Martin stated in late 2011 that they have resolved any stability issues using avionics software.
​
Hybrid Air Vehicles were sub-contracted by Northrop Grumman to build a vehicle for the US Army under very tight time constraints. The Long Endurance Multi-intelligence Vehicle made its maiden flight on 7 Aug 2012 but was then scrapped by the DoD and the ship was purchased by Hybrid Air and returned to the UK. After flying a prototype in 2016, plans are now well advanced to build a 10 ton capacity/100 passenger production model (Airlander 10) for a range of missions including persistent surveillance, air mobility and luxury tourism. A 50 ton vehicle is also being planned (Airlander 50). For more information please see the Hybrid Air Vehicles entry on the manufacturers page.
Plans to develop a heavy lift transport varient, now rebranded the Airlander, are on-going. The Boeing Skyhook project apparently progressed to design freeze, but there were insufficient backers to take the project to the prototype stage, and it was subsequently shelved.
In addition to aerodynamic lift, there is also the potential, initially proposed by Jean-Francois de Roziere, of heating the lifting gas to increase available lift. The principle has been used in the Ballooning world for several world records, but has not yet (to our knowledge) been successfully applied to a Helium airship. There is currently a renewed interest in the Hybrid concept, both for heavy lift and for surveillance purposes from the US Military.
Metal-clad Airships
The concept for metal-clad airships has been around since the mid-19th century, but the materials sciences of the time was unable to support such a concept. Only one truly metal-clad airship has actually been built, the ZMC-2 built for the US Navy in 1929. ZMC02 used thin aluminium panels (2 mm thick) on internal supporting rings, stitched together with 3.5 million alloy rivets, giving a durable gas-tight construction. The structure, however, needed to be pressurised to sustain flight loads. Additionally, to increase stability of the shell the design gave a double curvature to virtually all points of the skin so the overall design resulted in a short, fat profile. Despite eight tail fins, the chaotic airflow pattern at the rear of the vehicle resulting from the low length/diameter ratio gave an unsteady flight path, and despite ten years successful service the design has not been repeated.
Designs for other metal-clads using similar techniques to the ZMC-2, have frequently been proposed. These include the Wren Skyships RS1, and the current proposal by Varialift of the UK. Note: the initial Varialift proposal is planned to test a buoyancy control mechanism.
​
An evolution of the metal-clad, is the composite-clad hull, of the type proposed by Worldwide Aeros. This proposal comprises a framework of composite construction, covered with a gas-tight composite shell. Work on the prototype is underway, funded by the US Military under the Pelican Programme. This project is intended for the Heavy Lift Transport segment.
Source: 'An introduction to the Airship' - Edwin Mowforth